- Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Crombie
- Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Cromwell
- Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Cromartie
- Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Crome
Mks Toolkit for Developers V9.0 1U Win ME NT 2000 XP 2003 Crom — v9.0 Patch 3: Release Notes MKS Toolkit is the leader in UNIX to Windows user wanting a free optimizing compiler to use with the MKS Toolkit development Mks Toolkit — Interoperability V9.0 1U Win ME/NT/2000/XP/2003 Crom — TRG Accessories, There are no reviews for this item. MKS Software Licenses - run unix scripts on windows via unix emulation MKS Mortice Kern Systems Software - MKS Toolkit allows you to run Unix/Linux commands on Windows. Various ljet2100 new boxed canon 7527a001aa ibm igb microdrive travel kit accsw/type2 pcmcia adapter yosemite technologies inc 70021019 tapeware microsoft clusters crom informatics 00 wasp mobilinventory bundle perpw/spt1500 pda infocus lamp025 replacement lamp for dp9280 mks m661681 mks toolkit interoperability crom8.1 1u powerware. Windows &.NET Magazine UPDATE--October 14, 2003. Paul Thurrott. MKS Toolkit products provide essential UNIX-Windows interoperability functionality to millions of users worldwide. And working environments quickly and easily from UNIX to Windows. The MKS Toolkit products also allow pure Windows users to automate routine tasks with.
WinRAR Free Download and compress or extract your files. It is full offline installer standalone setup of WinRAR v5.71.
Image-Line - FL Studio Producer Edition 20.1.1.795 x64 PORTABLE| 2.14 GB Image-Line Portable Version FL Studio Producer Edition is a new version of the world's best program for creating your own music, with its help you can create your own tracks of any style, also record vocals, reduce it, edit it, cut it, change it and another million different functions for working with sound. Fl studio 12 portable. FL Studio is the fastest way from your brain to speakers. Everything you need in one package to compose, arrange, record, edit, mix. Now the program interface is easy to scale for any screen resolution of your monitor. It is a complete music software, which is more than 14 years of innovative developments.
SFU 2.0までは MKS Toolkit がベースとなっていたが. Windows Server 2003; Windows XP Professional SP1以降. Windows 9x/NT/2000/XPに移植された. Reflection® for the Multi-Host Enterprise Standard Edition v9.0 Reflection® for UNIX and OpenVMS v9.0 Reflection® Suite for X v9.0. Mortice Kern Systems, Inc. MKS Toolkit 7.0.1 MKS Toolkit Developer Edition 7.5 MPG Time Almanac of the 20th Century. Server for Windows 95/98/Me/NT/2000/XP 日本語版. CNET's Forum on Windows legacy operating systems, (XP, 2000/NT, ME, & Windows 95/98) is the best source for finding help or getting troubleshooting advice from a community of experts.
WinRAR Overview
WinRAR is a data compression utility that completely supports RAR and ZIP archives and is able to unpack CAB, ARJ, LZH, TAR, GZ, ACE, UUE, BZ2, JAR, ISO, 7Z, Z archives. It consistently makes smaller archives than its competitors, hence saving more disk space and transmission costs.
WinRAR is an easy to use, lightweight and flexible archiving utility that can unpack most archive formats. It can also compress to both RAR and ZIP. WinRAR offers a graphic interactive interface utilizing mouse and menus as well as the command line interface. WinRAR is easier to use than many other archivers with the inclusion of a special “Wizard” mode which allows instant access to the basic archiving functions.
WinRAR’s interface has a simple interface. You can start creating (or add to) an archive by dragging and dropping your files into the interface or by browsing through the Folder Tree side panel (when enabled). From there, the most common functions are laid out in the form of colorful, mostly intuitive icons along the top, which can all be customized by downloading themes from the company’s Web site. You can Add files to, Extract, Test, Delete, or even Repair archives right from the main interface. Drop-down menus house the program’s more advanced features, including self-extracting archives, archive locking, bench marking, and auto deletion of temp files.
Features of WinRAR
- Creates smaller archives, saves disk space, transmission cost and valuable working time.
- Complete support for RAR (WinRAR native conversion format) and ZIP archives, and unpacking of ARJ, LZH, TAR, GZ, ACE, UUE, BZ2, JAR, ISO, EXE, 7z, Z, and xz archives.
- Ideal for sending data through web.
- Ideal for multimedia files, it automatically recognizes and selects best compression method.
- Allows you to split archives into separate volumes easily making it possible to save them into different disks.
- Multi threaded compression.
- Support for advanced NTFS file system options and Unicode in file names.
- Data redundancy is provided via recovery records and recovery volumes, allowing reconstruction of damaged archives.
WinRAR System Requirements
- Operating Systems: Windows 98, ME, NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Vista, Server 2003,Server 2008, Windows 7,Server 2012, Windows 8
- Processor: 32bit, 64bit supported
- RAM: 64 MB
- Hard Disk Space: 3MB free hard disk required.
Technical Setup Details For WinRAR
- Software Name: WinRAR
- File Name: WinRAR_5.71.zip
- Setup Full Size: 6.3 MB
- Date Added: 19th July 2019
- Developers: RarLab
WinRAR Free Download
Click on below button to download WinRAR full setup. This is direct single link for WinRAR. It works for both 32 bit and 64 bit machines. We have provided offline installer standalone setup for WinRAR below. This is winrar for windows 8, Windows 7 or XP.
Before Installing Software You Must Watch This Installation Guide Video
Related Posts
This Post was Last Updated On: July 30, 2019
microsoft has removed some useful command line options from its newest version of windows for consumers, windows me (millennium edition). the new os, set to be released in september [corrected from august – robgeek], refuses to run the “sys” command on a floppy drive [meaning “sys a:”] to create a [clean] boot disk, and also refuses to acknowledge the “format” command from the command line. [this does work when you boot from a windows me boot disk, but reportedly not when you are in the os booted off a hard drive.]
the register reported on this and the related problem of the trouble that this will pose to updating the bios on motherboards that require a boot disk. the only way to make a boot disk in windows me now is to use microsoft's gui tool that fills up most of the floppy disk with data, leaving little space (under 240 kb) left for bios update utilities and files.
rob's opinion
now why did microsoft change these commands? i can understand microsoft removing them so that it can protect itself from viruses that try to reformat hard drives caused by the poor security in its outlook mail client. however, ms should have put some kind of expert switch in there that will allow geeks to do whatever they want. i would expect that microsoft will eventually enable some sort of downloadable “sys” tool that will make a thinner boot disk for windows me. or why can't we just delete some of those 30 useless programs that microsoft installs on the boot disk? i'm sure you don't need all of them to boot.
if microsoft cared about the geek segment, it would work more on the security of its os and spend less time restricting useful functions. i've always thought that windows oses would be much cooler with a stronger command line–basically one that would ship with many of the common unix commands built in, like tail, ls, grep, and top (please!). of course, you can easily change the os so that it does support those commands (even though i've never found a useful windows 98 version of top–any suggestions?), but why should we have to spend time with that?
[i made some edits to this item to make it clearer. the meaning of the item was, if you read the article on the register, that microsoft has removed some functionality from the standard command line when you boot from a hard drive. that meaning has not been changed.]
user comments (59 comments)
m$ is not for geeks (6:43pm est mon jun 26 2000)
i agree with you that m$ is dumbing down the desktop, and not catering to geeks. geeks are not in their business model! and for micro$oft, i'd say it's a good thing.
nearly all of the geeks i know use either macintosh or some variant of *nix. we've given up on windows. it doesn't suit our purposes, and we don't suit theirs. why should the great giant to the north (redmond) cater to what is basically less than 10% of the market, when they have the other 90% cornered?
of course they are dumbing things down. they have to in order to keep that 90%. as for the rest of us, i think we should be happy to work with other os's, and i'm sure microsoft does not miss us.
at least that's my two-cents.
— nt/unix admin geek – by seant
ms is win is a family os (6:53pm est mon jun 26 2000)
operating system % of total
windows 93.63 (grandma,sis,little joey and everything in between}
other 3.48 (hobbiest i.e amiga,freebsd,beos,linux,
os/2 ,freeloaders and those others that dont want to pay for software}
macintosh 2.53 (schools,publishing}
unix 0.36 (universities,old guard buissnes's)
– by robby
me x 2000 (8:04pm est mon jun 26 2000)
i'm a beta tester for windows me and the microsoft's objective is aproximate windows for home users to windows for enterprises. windows 2000 is more friendly and may be used in home and windows me does not runs under dos (dos is death here) but “per si” (dos window is an emulation also in nt). – by paulo h. g. jorge
m.o.n.o.p.o.l.y…. (8:09pm est mon jun 26 2000)
send gates back to the projects… with food stamps… – by hero
macintosh (8:15pm est mon jun 26 2000)
yeah, of course us mac users are snobs! we don't have to deal with stuff like that. we have to deal with the whole mac world becoming usb and actually starting to conform to modern standards. but our software was never the problem. we have the best software. and for your information, macintosh counts for 13% of the market. schools, publishing, servers, small and some large businesses, web page design, music (garbage, korn and iced t come to mind as admiate mac users), and the everyday person who just fed up with that disease known as windows.
and as for the first comment, right on! microsoft won't miss us. but then again, we won't miss them one bit. – by eric d.
wrong (8:28pm est mon jun 26 2000)
first, to seant:
i don't think anybody is suggesting that m$ keep things simple for the majority of users. that doesn't explain why they shouldn't keep the geek tools in. they aren't really hurting anyone to have them there since command line tools make up a very small portion of the entire os so they aren't using much hard drive space (average geek tool is usually no more than 50k. average .dll is over 50k, usually way over). besides, what about all the m$ developers that might need some of those tools?
second, to robby:
you missed a little on the other. linux at least accounts for more than 5% and isn't limited to hobbiest. sure, it's a little difficult to use, but a lot of big businesses (weather.com for instance) use it for their servers. – by yoda
oops (8:31pm est mon jun 26 2000)
i meant that i don't think anybody is suggesting that m$ not keep things simple for the majority of users. – by yoda
remember the “undelete” command? (9:13pm est mon jun 26 2000)
wouldn't it be great if they kept all their original dos 6.22 commands? i have really missed a working version of unformat and undelete, especially when formatting the wrong hd by accident. doesn't surprise me that they get rid of format, and it won't surprise me when they get rid of the “dir” command also. – by zaph1
this story is full of shit (12:14am est tue jun 27 2000)
i usually find this site to be one of the best sources for pc info on the net. but you blew it big time this time. do a little more checking on a more recent build. you're wrong. – by scott
top for windows (4:11am est tue jun 27 2000)
regarding a windows version of top, you can use wintop. it's gui and not command line, anyway it gets its job done. it found it on the “powertoys” collections – on the microsoft web site. – by alfio
os stats (4:16am est tue jun 27 2000)
just by looking at some of the comments about the distribution of operating systems through the industry, i think that a recount is in order, as the majority of local isps use linux (the one i work for does!) and alot of server hosting services are offering linux as an os choice (e.g. yahoo! servers). free/net/openbsd is also making a bit of an impact in the open source arena. i'm not trying to steal any of apple's thunder either as os x is making a few waves with every rumour heard about it. maybe the monopoly held by microsoft isn't as diverse as the media likes to imply, and a new os era is about to dawn. – by mark jarrett
you are wrong. (6:05am est tue jun 27 2000)
format, fdisk, sys are all available and functional on hard disks when you boot with a startup floppy created with the final build (3000.2) of windows millennium edition. check your facts, or at least get your second-hand news from a reputable news source, not the register.
regards,
graeme bennett,
editor, www.pcbuyersguide.com – by graeme bennett
one more detail… (6:09am est tue jun 27 2000)
your story claims that the new os is “set to be released in august.”
this is also false. it has already been released to manufacturing, and will be available at retail on sept. 14th. more “facts” from the register? – by graeme
me= nt 5.3 (6:19am est tue jun 27 2000)
far be it from me to defend anything that the demons of redmond dumps on the world but, i think that part of this is the fact that the w2k family is more nt-like than the windows on top of dos legacy.
to hell with it, linux now!!!!!!!! – by tangent z
command line (8:51am est tue jun 27 2000)
ms dog command line? why bother? first thing i do with any version of windows is to install mks toolkit to give me unix shells. for geek-type functions these are far superior to anything you could ever do with the ms dos interpreter. – by leng
mac vs m$ (11:20am est tue jun 27 2000)
i agree with the above comments indicating that mac is better than m$. i have briefly tried mac before i found linux and agree that just between the two, mac is better than m$. i just am disappointed that mac didn't take off better so that mac hardware and software could be found in stores. if they had, i definately would have switched to them years ago. – by mike c
We now have 154,836 downloads in the member section. To celebrate our launch we are offering unlimited full download access for $3.99/mo! FileFortune.com is a new file sharing web service which gives you access to literally hundreds of thousands of direct downloads including software, games, movies, tv shows, mp3 albums, ebooks and more! Our downloads database is updated daily to provide the latest download releases on offer. Colasoft capsa 7 1 keygen free download. This is a limited offer and will soon expire and revert back to the normal member price.
well show me some stat of 5%+ linux (11:48am est tue jun 27 2000)
http://www.statmarket.com
heres where i got my stats
now show me where they did a study and found linux had a 5% consumer market share
remember were talking about a consumer os which windows me is
– by robby
reputable news source? (12:00pm est tue jun 27 2000)
i'll take the register over m$ marketing flacks any day.
– by icesnake frostbringe
damn,….people! (12:05pm est tue jun 27 2000)
wow!…to think, scott and/or joel actually made a mistake. why don't do a fellow geek/friend a favor and advise that there was an error instead of needlessly bashing them on the head.
and last time i checked, this site did not contain the words “world headline news”. free your mind and actually turn on the tv, open the newspaper or use other news related sites for a change instead of getting your feelings hurt when you hear inaccurate information.
please try to exercise a little forgiveness and maybe….just maybe someone won't crap down your throat next time u happen to f__k up.
what goes around, comes around. – by soulrom
sois unos inutiles (1:04pm est tue jun 27 2000)
ni para poner mal a microchof sois capazes de poner una noticia real que os sirva de base.
mal vamos asi………… – by abrasax
consumer os? (1:39pm est tue jun 27 2000)
you said nothing specifically about consumer oss. all you did was stated some facts. i checked the website you pointed out. the facts you mention aren't even on that site though, they are on the zdnet.com site. besides, the stats they mention are internet surfers, not just computers in general (i.e. workstations, pcs, servers, etc) which is what i was referring to. next time be more specific with your facts and maybe point to your sources. and no, i don't remember exactly where i got my information. all i do remember is that linux out sold nt in the server market last year. by how much, i unfortunately do not remember. – by yoda
for yoda (1:45pm est tue jun 27 2000)
you take exception with my statement that m$ must dumb things down to keep the consumer market, stating that it wouldn't require much more disk space to include the geekier tools. you miss my point. the problem is not disk space — obviously most consumer machines ship with 10+ mb of available space now.
the issue that m$ is addressing with the dumbing down of the desktop is the problem of users calling tech-support because they've “broken” their machines by tinkering with stuff they know nothing about. literally, micro$oft is protecting users from their own ignorance. if they don't have format.com, they can't blow away their disk.
it just makes sense, and they don't care about losing that slim geek-market, if they can retain the extremely large mom-and-pop-market.
btw — i'm looking for another source for these desktop stats.
– by seant
checking my facts (2:50pm est tue jun 27 2000)
regarding the item i repeated below, the news item from the register stated that format and sys are not available from the command line when booting of a hard drive. obviously, they have to be available when booting off a floppy.
also, i fixed the date from august to september.
regarding this:
Viliv x70 wifi driver download. I found two chipset drivers for the X70. I found several sites mentioning that it has an Intel SCH US15W chipset. If this is the correct chipset then Intel has the drivers for Windows 7 and Windows XP, use button below to link to site. The other button downloads the chipset device driver that Viliv. Downloads: Viliv S5 Downloads: Viliv X70. If I remember correctly the big hurdle is getting wireless to work. This is available under the Viliv N5 link. Larger viliv drivers on onedrive. This site is meant to host files for the Viliv N5, Viliv S5, and Viliv X70. I am not in any way associated with Viliv.
format, fdisk, sys are all available and functional on hard disks when you boot with a startup floppy created with the final build (3000.2) of windows millennium edition. check your facts, or at least get your second-hand news from a reputable news source, not the register.
regards,
graeme bennett,
editor, www.pcbuyersguide.com – by graeme bennett
– by robgeek
me is not for you (5:27pm est tue jun 27 2000)
listen up idiots. windows me is meant for beginners. if you want power, use windows 2000. m$ controls well over 90% of the market. macintosh's market share shrinks every year. why? well, all of you a.b.m.'s (anything but microsoft) have linux to play with now. windows 2000 is a superior product and i don't know why anyone would want to use anything else. if you do choose to use an inferior os, like linux or mac, go ahead. just shut the f*ck up and stop telling us about your fantasies about superiority. until today, you never heard anyone spreading false rumors about your choice in computing lifestyle, so stop bashing mine just because the majority of the world agrees with me. as to the idiots talking that mac supremacy, what is the fastest mac? are you going to pay $4000 for that 500mhz computer that doesn't even support smp? guess what, i can buy a dual gigahertz pentium w/ 256 megs ram for the same price as that g4 you are still waiting to have delivered, so don't spout your superiority rhetoric. every mac application is available on the pc and nt/2000 outperforms mac dramatically. if graphic artists were intelligent enough to figure out how to use 2 mouse buttons, none of them would be running mac. – by steven
me is for most of us (8:27pm est tue jun 27 2000)
yet again, another flaming bonehead.
a. speed is not wrapped up entirely in mhz. if you're going to blast competetive systems, approach it from more than one angle. otherwise, you look foolish and ignorant.
b. being a user of the 9x kernal myself, i take offense at the statement that winme is meant for beginners. winme is meant for the largest segment of the population, whom microsoft knows will not spend the extra money on nt. microsoft has removed key networking functionality from winme, and this is a concern for those of us using netware, banyan, etc. the majority of small businesses (which are the majority of employers) use 95/98, not nt. a lot of geeks out there are doing some pretty snazzy stuff out there to get m$ products to cooperate in an enterprise environment (oh, oh, the evil “e” word)
c. the mouse button thing is a really cheap shot, can you be a little more original next time?
wasting bandwidth for your amusement 8-)
– by acehunter
pssssttttt (1:07am est wed jun 28 2000)
and what are vb programmers going to do?!!? we cant switch to linux or mac? – by mike
games (9:10am est wed jun 28 2000)
games – by game player
Download page for LEGO Marvel Super Heroes - Universe in Peril (EU) ROM for Nintendo DS DS NDS. ROMs, ISOs, Games. Most Popular Sections. PS2 ISOs (4078) PSP ISOs (2907) PSX ISOs (5134). This game is unavailable. Get monthly updates and win prizes. Subscribe to our FREE newsletter. No spam, No bullshit, we promise! Game information, description, and download page for LEGO Marvel Super Heroes - Universe in Peril (EU) ROM for Nintendo DS DS NDS ROMs, ISOs, Games Most Popular Sections. Lego marvel super heroes 2 trailer. Home » NDS Roms » Lego Marvel Super Heroes Universe in Peril NDS Rom Lego Marvel Super Heroes Universe in Peril NDS Rom NDS Roms Leave a comment 392 Downloads.
power users – microsoft (8:56pm est wed jun 28 2000)
there is **never** a one-size-fits-all solution. choose your os based on your current situation.
if you are staying with microsoft:
i do agree that **if** power users are going to use a microsoft operating system, it should **probably** be windows 2000, especially if you're up to your ears in established pci cards and some usb devices. keep an eye out for service packs.
if you need an operating system that supposedly supports the “absolute latest and greatest” gizmo (especially if it is a usb device), **for the time being**, run windows 98. windows 2000 support for new gadgets will pick up in time, but for now most of the toys seem to be targeted at windows 98.
if you have a bunch of legacy hardware and pci cards that have been around for a while, go with windows nt 4.0 workstation with service pack 5 (or later) applied. windows nt 4.0 seems to be surprisingly well-suited as a workstation operating system, although i would never rely on it for mission-critical server functions.
best regards,
k. adams
kadams@netdotcom.com
– by k. adams
Writing a book requires something major. It requires the right attitude, a powerful book idea, some solid writing prompts, and the best writing software out there. And we know which writing software is best for you – and more importantly, why it matters. https://linomg.netlify.app/story-book-writing-program.html.
power users – non-microsoft (8:57pm est wed jun 28 2000)
if you're going to skip the microsoft route, you essentially have three more choices:
for those users who want easy setup and hope to never encounter a command line, go with a power mac. the latest round of macs support most usb devices and are relatively stable compared to pcs with microsoft operating systems. most medium- to upper-level macs have dual-monitor support and extensive multimedia capabilities built right in. the downside is the initial investment: mac systems generally cost about 50% more than pc systems for comparable performance (i'm talking real-world response times, not raw mhz).
beos is an up-and-coming os for both pc and power mac platforms. it is geared toward multimedia production, but its support for the latest hardware is pretty sketchy. it has native smp support (up to 4 cpus), and seems to have very good multitasking/multithreading capability and good crash protection/recovery features.
and of course, everybody's “favorite” watchword: linux. if you like to dig into the guts of your operating system, aren't afraid of a command line, and are willing to invest the time, linux is the way to go. linux is quick, stable, and resource-stingy. it can also be complicated, cryptic, definitely frustrating from time-to-time, and short on gadget support. if you have the patience and aren't afraid of tearing into config files with a text editor, linux can provide a lot of satisfaction.
best regards,
k. adams
kadams@netdotcom.com
– by k. adams
microsoft/gates for president! (1:04pm est fri jun 30 2000)
you go steve! i too am always amazed at the ms bashers. while the oil, drug, phone companies screw us, congress is worried about ms. i worked at ms for 2 yrs (87-89) & was there when ibm'ers setup house inside our building to “collaborate” on windows 3. they wore white shirts/ties and locked their doors when not there, a interesting contrast to the rest of us. insignificant as that sounds, it reveals much. if companies like ibm or apple ruled the world, i guarantee you they would have their right hand around your proverbial computer neck & left in your pocket – and all the crap that you “suspect” from ms would have been the norm from ibm or apple. does anyone remember microchannel? gates has always placed the “best” interests of the computer community at heart, that's why windows had to be compatible with more hardware/software than either os2/mac-os together – sorry windows crashes with your jack-shit device/program from timbuktu. and screw netscape too, so what if ms capitalizes on its os with a integrated browser – who cares – it's just a frigging tool? it's not like ms “ripped off” netscape – remember mosaic – the free/university developed code that netscape sold to you? (yeah, yeah – ok they added a few good features.) anyway, apple users love the fact that their software/hardware is so stable because of the fact that it's so intimate – but you'll curse the fact that ms tries to do that too – for your own good even! oh, and one last thing for those mac users that love to revel in tales of how ms “stole” their gui – for the last time – it came from work xerox did. ms hired some of these same programmers from – i knew several of them. is paying those programmers to do the same thing stealing? the ugly truth is that mac users ought to see a big ms logo on their screens every time they boot up & thank gates=god that he bailed their asses out with a $100 million donation.
– by jim-c
have to lagh!!! (12:16pm est wed jul 05 2000)
after reading all the coments i just have to laugh. this started as a comment that microsoft has removed some useful features from windows millenium edition (i refuse to use that stupid acronym) and has degraded into a “my dad is better than your dad” pissing contest.
i have used macs (nice machines, limitted market), used win9x (just basically bloat code since 95 — major market share and currently my main os of choice), linux (great geek factor, not ready for average joe computer user), and windows 2000 (uninstalled after a week due to constant freeze ups — great if all you do is general office work [i.e. not ready for home use and not intended for such]).
the fact still remains that microsoft has steadily removed the usefulness of their win9x line in favor of “protecting” the user from doing anything dangerous. if you toast your system because you run the command line “deltree *.*” without knowing what this command does live with the results.
i think what microsoft should be doing is offering a version of windows that is stricly the os (no ie, no wordpad, no games, no integrated web enhancements, etc.) to give people a real choice on the way they want to run their system. this is one of the big draws for linux, you can customize the install to include only what you want/need.
don't limit the os to the lowest common denominator just to save a few tech calls. now if the os only cost $50 (instead of $200+) then i could see where the tech call costs could be a factor.
one final point i would like to make is that i don't use win9x because i'm overly fond of the os. i use it because it gives me access to the software that i want to run. if i had a choice of systems to use without concern to software i would choice an amiga hands down. – by rhipf
your all nerds(7:41pm est thu aug 03 2000) your all nerds who need lives – by chris |
boot disk needed(10:39pm est thu aug 10 2000) please send me files to create windows me boot disk cheungj@yahoo.com – by jabba |
boot time…(12:07am est fri aug 11 2000) i thought the reason they removed the dos stuff was to decrease the boot time…. oh well, thats what i heard somewhere – by lucid |
w2k won't run my programs!(9:19am est sun aug 13 2000) why the heck would i want to run window 2000 pro instead of windows me when win2k won't run many of my programs????? – by me |
win2k ? you must be joking(5:22pm est fri aug 25 2000) firstly this entire thread is pointless because winme _does_ contain sys/format and they run fine in a dos box. secondly why is it always a freaking war over operating systems, does nobody have any real talent ? who gives a f**k what you run, what did you _do_ ? or maybe some of you here are the type that don't really do anything with their computer except install new garbage and bitch about why things don't work (maybe it's time for another format/clean install eh guys ?) i don't like my computer crashing either, but like someone up there pointed out, windows is where the programs we use are… – by ricochet |
windows millenium(7:00pm est sun sep 10 2000) i got a new micron computer that came with windows me and i can't access the internet from it to my local internet connection. in my opinion, it has some nice new things but overall it sucks. – by tim |
heloodd(9:20am est thu sep 14 2000) 09i0[i – by samuel |
winme & sys(10:37am est fri oct 06 2000) my aplogies for continuing such an old thread, but i feel i must point out certain things about windows millennium and dos support (which is what this article was about). for simplicity, i will focus on sys. many previous commentors have mentioned that sys does exist, and works fine. they are incorrect. type “sys a:” from a dos-box (winme version 4.90.3000: a.k.a. final retail), and you get the message: “you can only sys drive c: to try and repair the boot hard disk. use the startup disk option in add/remove programs to create an emergency boot disk.” i hope this doesn't need further clarification. as was stated in the article, microsoft has taken the extra effort to cripple dos utilities in windows millennium. – by kirel |
windows m.e is shite(5:59pm est wed nov 29 2000) what have microsoft been doing for the past 2 years? having a good holiday more like. all they have simply done is changed a few fucking icons and added shit that is annoying like mouse accelleration. it is 'not' more stable, i have had 3 lockups in 1 week, its totally smashed my modem drivers and now i have to wait for updates from rockwell. in my opinion go out and buy linux, redhat. these are real programmers instead of the monkeys bill gates is employing. – by john (uk) |
Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Crombie
me is for mickey mouse users(6:14pm est wed nov 29 2000) microsoft is going into the begginner bollocks with the o.s, soon microsoft windows will look more and control like a childs computer from toys'r'us. have microsoft actually realised that the world is not full of lame people wondering what a pc does. they should have 2 version of me one for the advanced and one for the shmucks… – by danny |
fdisk error(11:21am est sun dec 17 2000) the fdisk of windows me is faulty. if there a linux partition on the drvie it wipes out the partition without conforming!!! if anyone else has had similar problems please contact me on rakshit@onebox.com i know how to mend it! – by rakshit mehta |
windows(12:26am est sat mar 17 2001) if only bill would realize that leaving small computers at this point to apple would be the smart thing. linux is on lpars for gods sake! you will never see w2k on an lpar. therefore it will never have the power it requires (not to speak of the stability) of a linux or mvs or vm system. sorry bill, keep working on the security issues with outlook, and keep improving on word and excel and you can still be the worlds most richest man! – by russ |
dont even think about me with less than 128 megs fo ram!!!(11:24pm est sun apr 15 2001) i upgraded to windows me from windows 98 se. unfotenutley i have only 64 megs of ram. my system slowed down to a crawl espesially in team fortress and cs wouldnt even load! if u dont have 128 megs or more dont even think about windows me – by john |
well well(7:49am est wed apr 18 2001) firstly i would like to say well done to kirel, who should win a medal because he/she actually knows what they are talking about and has answered the original question. as for “john (uk)” to name one that mention the stability of their operating system etc.get a life. if your system crashes 3 times a week you “tim” you believe it sucks because you can't get on the internet ?? hmm let me see you had a go at setting it up yourself right! (i wouldn't be blaming windows me for the fact that your internet doesn't work). as for graeme bennett you are a very rude person “check your facts, or at least get your second-hand news from a reputable news source” your a dick. you should get your facts right before you go gloating the wrong information. yours truly – by luke |
windows me problems(4:22pm est wed jun 20 2001) i bought a system with me preinstalled and i have had loads of system crashes. i phoned a qualified technician and his advise was to disable nearly all the startup items and background tasks including the secondchance application. system crashes are now less frequent but they still occur quite regularly. now what is the point in having all these applications installed if all they do is stop my system from functioning properly? i still can't even run scandisk or defrag except in safe mode. anyway i say down with me. pierrealamos@hotmail.com – by pierre alamos |
geek mania(12:09pm est tue oct 09 2001) you geeks y r u geeky i think u r weird going on this site freak – by nincompoo |
pierre alamos- ure dead fucken right(8:32pm est tue jan 22 2002) ive got the exact same problem exept a while ago safe more dissapeared from my shutdown menu and all the alternative ways to boot to it result in my registry becoming corrupt forcing a reinstall of windows. this didnt fix the problem. i dont even know why i reinstalled my computer would be more functional running some ancient version of dos. or that old scratched up win95 cd. i rekon im gonna go buy windows 2000. o yeah- nincompoo, if you hate us geeks so much then why r u at the site dumbass – by techy dude |
win-me is sh*t!(4:30pm est sat jul 13 2002) look, just face it, windows mellennium edition is sh*t! i ran it for 2 days and got so p*ssed off with it that i installed windows 2000 prof, much happier now, what a waste of time and effort – windows me os sh*t dont use it! and your talking about suystem crashes luke? well, we all know how to solve that one! format c: form a windows me boot disk and install somethign thats worth using! – by rich |
defrag wont work(10:48am est sat jan 04 2003) i have win me and defrag and scandisk can never get past 2%, even if i leave it on all night. does anyone know how to fix this problem? – by andrew |
os/2 rules(6:35am est sun apr 06 2003) i used (relatively) good old windows 3.1 for a long time, since switching to a combination of nt 4ws and os/2 warp 4, both seem pretty stable. i`ve never used 9x/me signigicantly on my machine, and i really hated 95 on the university network. thankfully xp now gives the microsoft majority a chance of rather more stability, but windows still can`t match os/2 in many areas. 9x suits the majority who don`t want to mess about too much and don`t demand perfection. os/2`s wps is much nicer than explorer or perhaps x windows for that matter, but many things, like fixpaks for example, while nowhere near as difficult as unix, could well be intimidating for non-technical newbies (lets just say that you can`t simply click on a single file to install fixpaks). more technical users then, can always find some satisfaction elsewhere, while microsoft`s dodgy products unfortunately cater to the majority. – by tom |
me=miserabl e edition(2:19am est fri may 16 2003) after using windows since version 1.01 for dos i have to say it has not yet improved. oh yes, it's prettier, but still has the same problems it has had since the beginning. what would you expect from a college drop out. i will also have to say os/2 is the best os i have ever used just ibm couldn't figure out how to sell it. the imac however with mac osx is the best thing for consumer computers since sliced bread. ms is still a favor damaging desease. – by gswallow |
all of you are the real geeks(4:14pm est sat aug 30 2003) instead of complaining on microsoft. why don't you look at the bright side and see of all the features microsoft has integrated to make life easier for users. if linux was vast, compared to windows, i am sure virus would only be hanging on linux or unix. if a virus, worm or trojan was to be popular, then they would be written for windows. only because windows is the marjority in the market. grow up everybody !!! – by siexpert |
Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Cromwell
omg(8:41am est sat dec 20 2003) all i have to say is windows me blows big fat hairy chunks! – by bye me, lol |
help me out now(4:11am est wed jun 30 2004) i have a systm running winme . the mouse (serial) to the system is not moving even when the system booted to windows desktop. pls help – by shancompp@yahoo.com |
Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Cromartie
formatting info?(10:43pm est fri jul 09 2004) i have just bought a used sony that is running a windows 2000 prof with nt i am wanting to clear this out and put win98 on this machine,can ya give me the info on how to do this and what disk do i have to have for formatting?will a 98 disk work…thanks ernursestef@yahoo.com…thanks – by stef |
Mks Toolkit Interoperability V9.0 5u Win Me/nt/2000/xp/2003 Crome
i need ur help, sir(5:06am est mon sep 27 2004) dear sir, i m ahmad sheikh.i m 21 year of age. i need ur a little bit of help.i applied in many time in ur sites.i visited ur sites daily 2 hour for this purpose. i need only sir $6000.plz give me.its very very little money in front of u. i want to do my work by this money.plz help me. this is not very big.it is very little in front of ur generosity. plz give me sir, because u donate milllions.it has no worth.for replying me, plz, contact on my email: virgionboy_ahmad@yahoo.com – by ahmad |
i need ur little help(5:21am est mon sep 27 2004) respected sir, i m ahmad sheikh.i m 21 years old.i appliying once again i need ur a little bit of help.i applied in many time in ur sites.i visit ur sites daily 2 hour for this purpose. i need only sir $6000.plz give me.its very very little money in front of u. i want to do my work by this money.plz help me. this is not very big.it is very little in front of ur generosity. plz give me sir, because u donate milllions.it has no worth.for replying me, plz, contact on my email: virgionboy_ahmad@yahoo.com – by ahmad |
thanks(1:53pm est sat jan 07 2006) this is an excellent site thanks for the information! – by andy |